Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pawel Jozefiak's avatar

Glean's agents interpreting intent, selecting their own action sequences, adapting when context changes—that's fundamentally different from script-following bots. Self-determination without human-in-the-loop for every decision. That's the autonomy that matters in enterprise.

The governance layer (self-evaluate against policies) is the unspoken requirement though. You can't have self-directed agents without guardrails. Enterprise risk departments won't allow it. Glean doubling revenue to $200M by solving that problem is telling—enterprises will pay for autonomy if it's bounded.

The AI Architect's avatar

Impressive move by Glean here. The critikal distinction between autonomous agents and scripted assistants is spot on: can it iteratively self-determine the next action, or just follow a linear script? Most vendors call their bots "agents" but they're really just fancy automation workflows. Glean's approach of combining full enterprise context (100+ connectors, knowledge graphs, permissions) with dynamic reasoning changes the game. The real test will be weather these agents maintain alignment without going sideways when faced with edge cases governance didn't anticipate.

No posts

Ready for more?